Charters in a neighborhood bring cars. Lots of cars. That's got to be the most troubling part of having a charter build in your neighborhood. That's at least part of what some Freedom Academy's neighbors are complaining about, though the quotes in this story seem to indicate that even with no traffic the charter expansion would still be unwelcome.
Instead, upset neighbors say things like, "We're fighting for our neighborhood. Neighborhoods are threatened in Provo. If we let this happen the neighborhood will be gone."
Charters rightly have the same zoning exemptions as all other public school, meaning that a city can't use zoning rules to keep a public school away. What charters lack is the ability to find land and condemn it and then raise taxes to pay for a new building.
This blog, sponsored by Charter Solutions, highlights the success of charter schools, the movement, and education in general, particularly education reforms that increase parental involvement and local control, provide incentives for innovation and excellence, and reduce the role of bureaucracy in schools.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Utah teachers' plights highlighted in story about union "bullies"
The Washington Examiner this week had an op-ed by Joy Pullman, a national education reform advocate and author, that uses examples from Utah and other states to showcase how unions bully teachers, administrators, and competing associations in order to maintain a virtual monopoly over access to teachers.
In February, a Utah teacher named Cole Kelly testified in favor of a bill that would penalize school districts for not granting all teacher organizations -- not just unions, but also other professional organizations -- equal access to teachers.
A week later, he was released from his position as athletic director, which for school districts is tantamount to firing. His principal admitted she approved of his job performance but had released him because of pressure. Subsequently, other teachers texted Kelly to say they agreed with him but were afraid of being fired if they spoke out or left their union. He is contesting his release. ...
In Utah, for example, a refusal to allow all teachers associations equal access to privileges like payroll deductions, teacher in-services and orientation, and committees (often a union, but no other teachers association, is guaranteed a seat or several) is illegal.
Rather than granting access, many principals and superintendents just ignore phone calls and emails requesting it to avoid admitting they are breaking the law, said the state's AAE membership director, Charity Smith. This year, Smith said, a large male union representative met her at her presentation to a group of teachers and demanded she reveal whom she had talked to, where she was planning to visit next, and her home address. Teachers have whispered to her they were interested in leaving the union but couldn't talk about it openly at school, slipping her their email addresses for later communication.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Thanks for making my same point
Senator Stephenson probably didn't read my recent post about the vast disparity between funding for district schools and charter schools, but he made my same point (reform is more needed than simply funding increases, which have been shown ineffective by themselves) anyway. And he even gives a shout out to charters for absorbing most of the state's enrollment growth. "Utah’s charter schools are so popular that they attract more than half of the annual growth in Utah’s student population."
Read the whole thing here.
Read the whole thing here.
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Comparing charter taxpayer funding to districts
After a three-part series on school funding that focused exclusively on how charters spend their money, this is the first of a series of posts comparing the revenue and expenses of charters to school districts.
I expected to find that charters receive less money per student (they do) and that they therefore spend less in the classrooms on a per student basis (which they also do). I also expected charters to spend more per student on administration, since each charter is a single-school district and has the full reporting and administrative burden but spread over many fewer students (also true). I did not compare spending on facilities because the two models of governance are so different. Every charter school is paying on 100 percent of its occupied buildings, while districts have taxing and bonding authority with the full faith of the state government behind them, and have buildings that are fully paid off.
So, if we can't compare buildings, and the findings on funding, classroom spending, and administrative spending are just as expected, what's the point of writing about it? I'd say that digging into some details reveals some interesting things.
First, the summary revenue findings. District enrollment in the 2010-2011 school year was 536,113. Funding for those students from taxpayers (including all federal, state, and local taxes, but no revenue from sales or donations) was $2,651,827,989. (See explanation below for what sources of revenue this figure includes to make this number valid for comparisons to charter schools.) That funding is $7,448 per student from taxpayer sources.
Charter enrollment in the same year was 40,132 with total taxpayer funding of $243,505,558, about $67 million of which is meant to "replace" the local taxes raised by districts. That funding is an average of $6,068 per student--significantly less than districts receive per student from taxpayers.
There are some reasons for the disparity. Districts receive and spend money for transporting students to and from school. While a handful of charters also run busing programs, they receive no taxpayer funding for it, which results in lower per pupil funding. Charter enrollment is also slightly more weighted to younger students, which for charters are funded at a slightly lower amount, also resulting in lower per student funding for a valid reason. Finally, charter enrollment is also slightly less at-risk, slightly less special education, and quite a bit less severely disabled than district enrollment. Some state funding and a lot of federal funding is based not on overall enrollment but largely on enrollment among these disadvantaged populations.
In fact, one can also see that disparity among districts. For example, Ogden School District receives $8,342 per student in funding from taxpayers, while Weber District receives $6,745. It's not geography, but demographics that make up the key difference (though fewer kids and more commercial property in Ogden City also contributes--there's also a nearly $300 disparity between those two districts in funding per student from local property taxes).
Still, the "valid" reasons for the disparity in funding for students in charters versus district schools don't come close to making up a $1400(!) per student difference in funding. There is absolutely no reason why a child who chooses to attend a chartered public school should receive any less support from taxpayers than his neighbor who attends at a district public school.
I therefore pose these questions to policy makers:
All data comes from school Annual Financial Reports for 2010-2011 school year, available online here. “Local Property Tax” for purposes of this report includes only property tax (1100) for general fund, capital projects, or debt service for school districts, and only “Local Replacement Fund” for charter schools at $1,673 per student. State and federal revenue in the above table includes “Local Replacement Fund” for charter schools, which is also included (for the sake of comparing what districts raise in taxes to what charters receive to replace such revenue) in ”Local Property Tax.”
I expected to find that charters receive less money per student (they do) and that they therefore spend less in the classrooms on a per student basis (which they also do). I also expected charters to spend more per student on administration, since each charter is a single-school district and has the full reporting and administrative burden but spread over many fewer students (also true). I did not compare spending on facilities because the two models of governance are so different. Every charter school is paying on 100 percent of its occupied buildings, while districts have taxing and bonding authority with the full faith of the state government behind them, and have buildings that are fully paid off.
So, if we can't compare buildings, and the findings on funding, classroom spending, and administrative spending are just as expected, what's the point of writing about it? I'd say that digging into some details reveals some interesting things.
First, the summary revenue findings. District enrollment in the 2010-2011 school year was 536,113. Funding for those students from taxpayers (including all federal, state, and local taxes, but no revenue from sales or donations) was $2,651,827,989. (See explanation below for what sources of revenue this figure includes to make this number valid for comparisons to charter schools.) That funding is $7,448 per student from taxpayer sources.
Charter enrollment in the same year was 40,132 with total taxpayer funding of $243,505,558, about $67 million of which is meant to "replace" the local taxes raised by districts. That funding is an average of $6,068 per student--significantly less than districts receive per student from taxpayers.
There are some reasons for the disparity. Districts receive and spend money for transporting students to and from school. While a handful of charters also run busing programs, they receive no taxpayer funding for it, which results in lower per pupil funding. Charter enrollment is also slightly more weighted to younger students, which for charters are funded at a slightly lower amount, also resulting in lower per student funding for a valid reason. Finally, charter enrollment is also slightly less at-risk, slightly less special education, and quite a bit less severely disabled than district enrollment. Some state funding and a lot of federal funding is based not on overall enrollment but largely on enrollment among these disadvantaged populations.
In fact, one can also see that disparity among districts. For example, Ogden School District receives $8,342 per student in funding from taxpayers, while Weber District receives $6,745. It's not geography, but demographics that make up the key difference (though fewer kids and more commercial property in Ogden City also contributes--there's also a nearly $300 disparity between those two districts in funding per student from local property taxes).
Still, the "valid" reasons for the disparity in funding for students in charters versus district schools don't come close to making up a $1400(!) per student difference in funding. There is absolutely no reason why a child who chooses to attend a chartered public school should receive any less support from taxpayers than his neighbor who attends at a district public school.
I therefore pose these questions to policy makers:
- Do you think there is a difference in the value of a child who chooses to attend a chartered public school than one who chooses to attend a district public school? If there is a difference, why?
- If you consider that taxpayers are investing in public education, in what model of school do the taxpayers get he greatest return on their money? If you were investing your own money wanting the best "bang" for that personal buck, which model would you choose?
- When you hear people complain about the amount of money going to charter schools instead of school districts to educate students, don't you just want to roll your eyes?
- Now that it's obvious that students can receive a high quality education on significantly less money than we spend in school districts, isn't it time to recognize that the most important change to improve education isn't money, but reform?
Future posts will deal with how districts and charters spend their money. Below here is all the funding data for each district and charter school, and below that all the sources for the data.
| For Fiscal Year Ending | ||||
| June 30, 2011 | Enrollment | Property Tax or Local Replacement |
Total State and Federal | Total Tax Per Student |
| 01 Alpine | 66,045 | 129,121,178 | 305,313,882 | 6,578 |
| 02 Beaver | 1,566 | 6,282,817 | 8,521,274 | 9,453 |
| 03 Box Elder | 11,187 | 24,341,199 | 57,959,405 | 7,357 |
| 04 Cache | 15,409 | 23,722,109 | 80,859,689 | 6,787 |
| 05 Carbon | 3,459 | 13,734,819 | 17,721,782 | 9,094 |
| 06 Daggett | 168 | 1,064,590 | 2,164,042 | 19,218 |
| 07 Davis | 66,071 | 130,640,061 | 316,682,048 | 6,770 |
| 08 Duchesne | 4,449 | 13,944,870 | 24,472,740 | 8,635 |
| 09 Emery | 2,360 | 9,681,974 | 10,823,380 | 8,689 |
| 10 Garfield | 931 | 3,381,858 | 8,313,391 | 12,562 |
| 11 Grand | 1,510 | 7,690,733 | 7,681,154 | 10,180 |
| 12 Granite | 68,392 | 137,301,651 | 337,093,807 | 6,936 |
| 13 Iron | 8,485 | 23,112,763 | 43,532,330 | 7,854 |
| 14 Jordan | 49,730 | 109,217,107 | 226,645,196 | 6,754 |
| 15 Juab | 2,286 | 6,005,524 | 11,302,084 | 7,571 |
| 16 Kane | 1,176 | 6,351,658 | 6,960,869 | 11,320 |
| 17 Millard | 2,827 | 10,808,377 | 15,428,568 | 9,281 |
| 18 Morgan | 2,437 | 6,101,062 | 10,276,006 | 6,720 |
| 19 Nebo | 29,137 | 55,610,702 | 149,776,287 | 7,049 |
| 20 No. Sanpete | 2,420 | 4,432,580 | 13,188,991 | 7,282 |
| 21 No. Summit | 979 | 6,069,526 | 4,932,536 | 11,238 |
| 22 Park City | 4,351 | 47,585,662 | 5,595,384 | 12,223 |
| 23 Piute | 305 | 628,253 | 4,177,235 | 15,756 |
| 24 Rich | 484 | 3,364,491 | 3,244,159 | 13,654 |
| 25 San Juan | 2,912 | 7,162,182 | 33,345,273 | 13,911 |
| 26 Sevier | 4,533 | 8,794,677 | 27,715,630 | 8,054 |
| 27 So. Sanpete | 3,038 | 4,971,057 | 21,743,827 | 8,794 |
| 28 So. Summit | 1,433 | 9,035,144 | 5,842,507 | 10,382 |
| 29 Tintic | 220 | 275,499 | 3,366,845 | 16,556 |
| 30 Tooele | 13,439 | 28,445,680 | 70,963,753 | 7,397 |
| 31 Uintah | 6,684 | 28,612,581 | 30,434,844 | 8,834 |
| 32 Wasatch | 5,089 | 26,891,966 | 19,514,115 | 9,119 |
| 33 Washington | 25,673 | 82,862,203 | 120,700,602 | 7,929 |
| 34 Wayne | 567 | 1,137,907 | 4,475,823 | 9,901 |
| 35 Weber | 30,350 | 52,196,413 | 152,518,086 | 6,745 |
| 36 Salt Lake | 23,965 | 99,542,875 | 132,016,123 | 9,662 |
| 37 Ogden | 12,568 | 25,972,716 | 78,865,076 | 8,342 |
| 38 Provo | 13,376 | 31,263,588 | 71,093,211 | 7,652 |
| 39 Logan | 6,133 | 14,377,497 | 30,553,773 | 7,326 |
| 40 Murray | 6,500 | 16,850,949 | 27,858,815 | 6,878 |
| 42 Canyons | 33,469 | 122,441,567 | 148,153,447 | 8,085 |
| SUB TOTAL DISTRICTS | 536,113 | 1,341,030,065 | 2,651,827,989 | 7,448 |
| 68 Ogden Preparatory Academy | 1,068 | 1,786,764 | 6,617,604 | 6,196 |
| 74 American Preparatory Academy | 1,141 | 1,908,893 | 7,361,546 | 6,452 |
| 81 Walden School | 323 | 540,379 | 2,163,754 | 6,699 |
| 82 Freedom Academy | 673 | 1,125,929 | 4,104,199 | 6,098 |
| 83 AMES | 479 | 801,367 | 3,188,089 | 6,656 |
| 86 Pinnacle Canyon Academy | 503 | 841,519 | 4,148,660 | 8,248 |
| 87 City Academy | 185 | 309,505 | 1,544,196 | 8,347 |
| 88 Success School | 41 | 68,593 | 337,938 | 8,242 |
| 89 Soldier Hollow | 223 | 373,079 | 1,355,267 | 6,077 |
| 90 Tuacahn Hs For Performing Arts | 295 | 493,535 | 1,882,150 | 6,380 |
| 92 Uintah River High School | 45 | 75,285 | 589,971 | 13,110 |
| 93 John Hancock | 185 | 309,505 | 1,092,059 | 5,903 |
| 94 Thomas Edison Charter School North | 1,141 | 1,908,893 | 6,397,394 | 5,607 |
| 95 Timpanogos Academy | 423 | 707,679 | 2,509,048 | 5,932 |
| 97 Salt Lake Arts Academy | 301 | 503,573 | 1,670,491 | 5,550 |
| 98 Fast Forward Charter High School | 213 | 356,349 | 1,521,100 | 7,141 |
| A1 NUAMES | 400 | 669,200 | 2,666,407 | 6,666 |
| A2 The Ranches Academy Inc | 351 | 587,223 | 1,967,387 | 5,605 |
| A3 DaVinci Academy | 378 | 632,394 | 2,728,863 | 7,219 |
| A4 Summit Academy | 1,000 | 1,673,000 | 6,026,346 | 6,026 |
| A5 Itineris Early College High | 245 | 409,885 | 1,655,980 | 6,759 |
| A6 North Davis Preparatory Academy | 982 | 1,642,886 | 5,479,074 | 5,580 |
| A7 Moab Community School | 70 | 117,110 | 425,661 | 6,081 |
| A8 East Hollywood High | 317 | 530,341 | 2,237,671 | 7,059 |
| A9 Success Academy | 337 | 563,801 | 2,213,965 | 6,570 |
| 1B Utah County Academy of Sciences | 363 | 607,299 | 2,435,759 | 6,710 |
| 2B Lincoln Academy | 643 | 1,075,739 | 3,901,528 | 6,068 |
| 3B Beehive Sci. & Tech. Acad. | 233 | 389,809 | 1,366,550 | 5,865 |
| 4B Wasatch Peak Academy | 375 | 627,375 | 2,250,808 | 6,002 |
| 5B North Star Academy | 508 | 849,884 | 2,944,753 | 5,797 |
| 7B Ronald Reagan Academy | 675 | 1,129,275 | 4,242,529 | 6,285 |
| 8B American Leadership Academy | 1,506 | 2,519,538 | 9,354,628 | 6,212 |
| 9B Navigator Pointe Academy | 527 | 881,671 | 3,024,484 | 5,739 |
| 1C Odyssey School | 491 | 821,443 | 2,684,107 | 5,467 |
| 2C Intech Early College High School | 141 | 235,893 | 1,121,166 | 7,952 |
| 3C Entheos Academy | 514 | 859,922 | 3,285,843 | 6,393 |
| 4C Lakeview Academy | 711 | 1,189,503 | 4,126,930 | 5,804 |
| 5C Legacy Prepatory Academy | 876 | 1,465,548 | 4,910,907 | 5,606 |
| 6C Liberty Academy | 687 | 1,149,351 | 3,543,234 | 5,158 |
| 7C Monticello Academy | 756 | 1,264,788 | 4,343,017 | 5,745 |
| 8C Mountainville Academy | 681 | 1,139,313 | 4,066,396 | 5,971 |
| 9C Paradigm High School | 530 | 886,690 | 3,391,947 | 6,400 |
| 1D Renaissance Academy | 677 | 1,132,621 | 3,804,037 | 5,619 |
| 2D Channing Hall | 668 | 1,117,564 | 3,960,980 | 5,930 |
| 3D Spectrum Academy | 333 | 557,109 | 2,781,305 | 8,352 |
| 4D Syracuse Arts Academy | 1,019 | 1,704,787 | 5,715,765 | 5,609 |
| 5D George Washington Academy | 721 | 1,206,233 | 4,105,420 | 5,694 |
| 6D Noah Webster Academy | 552 | 923,496 | 3,191,353 | 5,781 |
| 7D Salt Lake School for Performing Arts | 185 | 309,505 | 1,124,137 | 6,076 |
| 8D Open Classroom School | 399 | 667,527 | 2,345,896 | 5,879 |
| 9D Canyon Rim Academy | 530 | 886,690 | 2,890,186 | 5,453 |
| 1E Guadalupe Schools | 121 | 202,433 | 967,170 | 7,993 |
| 2E Karl G. Maeser | 603 | 1,008,819 | 3,430,274 | 5,689 |
| 3E C.S. Lewis Academy | 293 | 490,189 | 2,117,690 | 7,228 |
| 4E Dual Immersion Academy | 451 | 754,523 | 2,954,622 | 6,551 |
| 5E Edith Bowen | 302 | 505,246 | 2,546,825 | 8,433 |
| 7E Gateway Preparatory Academy | 506 | 846,538 | 3,177,786 | 6,280 |
| 8E Merit College Preparatory Academy | 400 | 669,200 | 2,591,387 | 6,478 |
| 9E Providence Hall | 700 | 1,171,100 | 3,724,499 | 5,321 |
| 1F Quest Academy | 679 | 1,135,967 | 3,731,322 | 5,495 |
| 2F Rockwell Charter High School | 476 | 796,348 | 3,390,646 | 7,123 |
| 3F Venture Academy | 472 | 789,656 | 2,848,518 | 6,035 |
| 4F Salt Lake Center for Science Education | 290 | 485,170 | 1,807,826 | 6,234 |
| 5F Utah Virtual Academy | 2,044 | 3,419,612 | 11,342,470 | 5,549 |
| 6F Early Light Academy at Daybreak | 751 | 1,256,423 | 4,339,833 | 5,779 |
| 7F Excelsior Academy | 658 | 1,100,834 | 3,927,255 | 5,968 |
| 8F Hawthorn | 786 | 1,314,978 | 4,500,966 | 5,726 |
| 9F Open High School of Utah | 227 | 379,771 | 1,509,485 | 6,650 |
| 1G Oquirrh Mountain Charter School | 716 | 1,197,868 | 4,003,080 | 5,591 |
| 2G Vista at Entrada | 823 | 1,376,879 | 4,572,685 | 5,556 |
| 3G Bear River Charter School | 177 | 296,121 | 1,185,884 | 6,700 |
| 4G Maria Montessori Acacemy | 455 | 761,215 | 2,549,904 | 5,604 |
| 5G Quail Run Primary School | 555 | 928,515 | 3,355,222 | 6,045 |
| 6G Weilenmann School of Discovery | 550 | 920,150 | 3,126,744 | 5,685 |
| 7G Summit Academy High School | 172 | 287,756 | 1,166,741 | 6,783 |
| 8G Good Foundation Academy | 305 | 510,265 | 1,838,239 | 6,027 |
| SUB-TOTAL CHARTERS | 40,132 | 67,140,836 | 243,505,558 | 6,068 |
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
UCAS wins
Utah County Academy of Science won the state championship in the Science Olympiad this month. The leaders of the schools's team presented to their board at the meeting today. The school will now go to Orlando for the national Olympiad.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Pacific Heritage highlighted on Fox 13
As the first school of its kind in the country, Pacific Heritage Academy was highlighted this week on Fox 13 News. The school offers a curriculum that highlights pacific cultural heritage.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Are charters more efficient than districts?
The USOE blog linked today to a study analyzing the administrative spending of districts and charter schools in Michigan. In Michigan, the study finds that charters spend $800 more per student on administration and $1100 less in the classroom. As it happens, that's my next post in my series (see the previous entries here, here, and here.) on school funding in Utah. You might be surprised at what the data show. Stay tuned.
Consequences
I build budgets for a living. My own budget workbook for the schools I work with has seven tabs, dozens of formulas and tables and hundreds of links back and forth. All that so the "Budget" tab shows realistic revenue projections and expenses in line with the operation of the school. A single error in any one of those tabs, formulas, or links and the whole system can collapse. What looks like a balanced budget could actually be unsustainable.
A few weeks ago when the first set of state funding projections was sent out. Schools and districts noticed that the numbers didn't make sense--they showed less funding than the current year on the same enrollment. I suppose this is why. The State Office, in its projections of enrollment, provided the legislature with faulty numbers generated from a single error in a massive spreadsheet. The result was an under-appropriation of $25 million.
As a result of this error, Associate Superintendent Todd Hauber and Finance Director Larry Newton have resigned. I have nice things to say about both of them, but that will wait for a future post.
A few weeks ago when the first set of state funding projections was sent out. Schools and districts noticed that the numbers didn't make sense--they showed less funding than the current year on the same enrollment. I suppose this is why. The State Office, in its projections of enrollment, provided the legislature with faulty numbers generated from a single error in a massive spreadsheet. The result was an under-appropriation of $25 million.
As a result of this error, Associate Superintendent Todd Hauber and Finance Director Larry Newton have resigned. I have nice things to say about both of them, but that will wait for a future post.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
The cost of a building
This is the third in a series of posts analyzing school finance data. The first dealt with efficiency, defined as how much schools spent on the administration of their program on a per student basis. The second was about the results of that efficiency--schools that spend the most in classrooms on the education of students. This post is related to that, as it analyzes the schools spend the most on their buildings. Rent is typically the second largest line item (after employees, if they are counted as a single category) in any school's budget. Schools that spend more per student on buildings have less money for teacher salaries, curriculum, classroom technology and additional instructional staff like teachers' aides.
I take it as a given that while a building is necessary for educating students (no argument from virtual schools, please--that't not the point of this post) in a traditional setting, very little about that building has any impact on what students learn. If the building is safe and functional, nothing else matters to the education of the students. A school could theoretically spend its entire budget on the building, gold-plating the walls, and whatnot, and in fact the impact on students would be negative, as less money is available for things that actually do make a difference in the achievement of students.
Therefore, my postulate is that schools should seek a safe and functional building that costs as little as possible. In the list below, all charter schools are listed by those that spend the least amount per student to those that spend the most per student. Since the cost of a facility is more than just the cost to be in it, the expenses here include what schools pay for rent plus the cost of maintenance and operation of their schools, including utilities.
Some interesting findings:
All data comes from Annual Financial Reports submitted by each school, which reports its own expenses. Expenses include function 26 (maintenance and operations, including utilities, custodial compensation and contracts, and custodial supplies) plus payments for charter school debt service (fund 31).
I take it as a given that while a building is necessary for educating students (no argument from virtual schools, please--that't not the point of this post) in a traditional setting, very little about that building has any impact on what students learn. If the building is safe and functional, nothing else matters to the education of the students. A school could theoretically spend its entire budget on the building, gold-plating the walls, and whatnot, and in fact the impact on students would be negative, as less money is available for things that actually do make a difference in the achievement of students.
Therefore, my postulate is that schools should seek a safe and functional building that costs as little as possible. In the list below, all charter schools are listed by those that spend the least amount per student to those that spend the most per student. Since the cost of a facility is more than just the cost to be in it, the expenses here include what schools pay for rent plus the cost of maintenance and operation of their schools, including utilities.
Some interesting findings:
- At the top of the list Itineris, at only $2 per student, has the most efficient occupancy of all charter schools. Their building was paid up front in one lump as part of the construction cost of a school they share with Salt Lake Community College and the Jordan Applied Technology Center. The minimal cost here is reflective of other facility-related expenses.
- Utah Virtual Academy, as a large virtual school, spends very little on facilities, as you'd expect. Open High School, on the other hand, spends significantly more, though still below the system-wide average. Still, that's a lot for a school with no school and only a very small office in a cheap building downtown.
- As a group, high schools spend much less per student than elementary schools. Several high schools (Itineris, AMES, NUAMES, Success, SL SPA) share facilities and their costs with other schools or colleges, while that arrangement is very uncommon in lower grades.
- High schools that operate out of portable units and old buildings (Moab, John Hancock) spend less.
- At the high end of the scale are schools (NPA, APA, Gateway) that purchased their building in 2011, leading to very high one-time expenses. Next year's numbers will be more indicative of their ongoing facility costs.
- In fact, this list is less apples-to-apples than previous lists on this topic. Schools that opened in FY2011 (Weilenmann) don't have a full year's of occupancy included in their average, so they are understated. Some schools (like Liberty) just got tremendous deals on their buildings because of other issues. Some (Mountainville) expended their facility with large one-time expenses sending their average up.
- When you leave out the outliers at the top and bottom of the list, the average school spends $1536 on facilities.
| School | Failities Spending | Enrollment |
| A5 Itineris Early College High | $ 2 | 245 |
| 5F Utah Virtual Academy | $ 41 | 2044 |
| A1 NUAMES | $ 130 | 400 |
| A9 Success Academy | $ 205 | 337 |
| 83 AMES | $ 230 | 479 |
| 7D Salt Lake School for Performing Arts | $ 243 | 185 |
| 7G Summit Academy High School | $ 367 | 172 |
| 1B Utah County Academy of Sciences | $ 408 | 363 |
| 93 John Hancock | $ 459 | 185 |
| 8D Open Classroom School | $ 462 | 399 |
| 92 Uintah River High School | $ 529 | 45 |
| 90 Tuacahn Hs For Performing Arts | $ 530 | 295 |
| 88 Success School | $ 697 | 41 |
| 3G Bear River Charter School | $ 731 | 177 |
| 95 Timpanogos Academy | $ 770 | 423 |
| A7 Moab Community School | $ 841 | 70 |
| 4F Salt Lake Center for Science Education | $ 856 | 290 |
| A2 The Ranches Academy Inc | $ 933 | 351 |
| 97 Salt Lake Arts Academy | $ 936 | 301 |
| 6C Liberty Academy | $ 975 | 687 |
| 94 Thomas Edison Charter School North | $ 1,024 | 1141 |
| 3C Entheos Academy | $ 1,160 | 514 |
| 9C Paradigm High School | $ 1,176 | 530 |
| 81 Walden School | $ 1,215 | 323 |
| 86 Pinnacle Canyon Academy | $ 1,221 | 503 |
| 6G Weilenmann School of Discovery | $ 1,227 | 550 |
| 9F Open High School of Utah | $ 1,236 | 227 |
| 1D Renaissance Academy | $ 1,271 | 677 |
| 1E Guadalupe Schools | $ 1,275 | 121 |
| 1F Quest Academy | $ 1,290 | 679 |
| 4C Lakeview Academy | $ 1,303 | 711 |
| 9D Canyon Rim Academy | $ 1,309 | 530 |
| 2D Channing Hall | $ 1,319 | 668 |
| 7C Monticello Academy | $ 1,351 | 756 |
| 9E Providence Hall | $ 1,404 | 700 |
| 1C Odyssey School | $ 1,409 | 491 |
| 7B Ronald Reagan Academy | $ 1,429 | 675 |
| 5B North Star Academy | $ 1,510 | 508 |
| 5C Legacy Prepatory Academy | $ 1,514 | 876 |
| 3D Spectrum Academy | $ 1,515 | 333 |
| 87 City Academy | $ 1,523 | 185 |
| 6D Noah Webster Academy | $ 1,529 | 552 |
| 2B Lincoln Academy | $ 1,540 | 643 |
| 7F Excelsior Academy | $ 1,548 | 658 |
| 2G Vista at Entrada | $ 1,551 | 823 |
| 4B Wasatch Peak Academy | $ 1,554 | 375 |
| 2E Karl G. Maeser | $ 1,578 | 603 |
| A4 Summit Academy | $ 1,590 | 1000 |
| 5D George Washington Academy | $ 1,611 | 721 |
| A6 North Davis Preparatory Academy | $ 1,614 | 982 |
| 3F Venture Academy | $ 1,624 | 472 |
| 98 Fast Forward Charter High School | $ 1,634 | 213 |
| 8B American Leadership Academy | $ 1,659 | 1506 |
| 8G Good Foundation Academy | $ 1,671 | 305 |
| 4E Dual Immersion Academy | $ 1,684 | 451 |
| 5G Quail Run Primary School | $ 1,694 | 555 |
| 82 Freedom Academy | $ 1,715 | 673 |
| 68 Ogden Preparatory Academy | $ 1,759 | 1068 |
| 4D Syracuse Arts Academy | $ 1,963 | 1019 |
| 4G Maria Montessori Acacemy | $ 1,982 | 455 |
| 3B Beehive Sci. & Tech. Acad. | $ 1,989 | 233 |
| 2C Intech Early College High School | $ 2,014 | 141 |
| 1G Oquirrh Mountain Charter School | $ 2,099 | 716 |
| 8F Hawthorn | $ 2,183 | 786 |
| A8 East Hollywood High | $ 2,309 | 317 |
| 6F Early Light Academy at Daybreak | $ 2,336 | 751 |
| 8C Mountainville Academy | $ 2,500 | 681 |
| 5E Edith Bowen | $ 2,617 | 302 |
| 8E Merit College Preparatory Academy | $ 2,640 | 400 |
| 3E C.S. Lewis Academy | $ 2,774 | 293 |
| 2F Rockwell Charter High School | $ 2,799 | 476 |
| A3 DaVinci Academy | $ 2,868 | 378 |
| 89 Soldier Hollow | $ 3,940 | 223 |
| 9B Navigator Pointe Academy | $ 7,153 | 527 |
| 74 American Preparatory Academy | $ 14,365 | 1141 |
| 7E Gateway Preparatory Academy | $ 19,497 | 506 |
All data comes from Annual Financial Reports submitted by each school, which reports its own expenses. Expenses include function 26 (maintenance and operations, including utilities, custodial compensation and contracts, and custodial supplies) plus payments for charter school debt service (fund 31).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)