Sunday, April 29, 2012

Utah teachers' plights highlighted in story about union "bullies"

The Washington Examiner this week had an op-ed by Joy Pullman, a national education reform advocate and author, that uses examples from Utah and other states to showcase how unions bully teachers, administrators, and competing associations in order to maintain a virtual monopoly over access to teachers.
In February, a Utah teacher named Cole Kelly testified in favor of a bill that would penalize school districts for not granting all teacher organizations -- not just unions, but also other professional organizations -- equal access to teachers.
A week later, he was released from his position as athletic director, which for school districts is tantamount to firing. His principal admitted she approved of his job performance but had released him because of pressure. Subsequently, other teachers texted Kelly to say they agreed with him but were afraid of being fired if they spoke out or left their union. He is contesting his release. ...
In Utah, for example, a refusal to allow all teachers associations equal access to privileges like payroll deductions, teacher in-services and orientation, and committees (often a union, but no other teachers association, is guaranteed a seat or several) is illegal.
Rather than granting access, many principals and superintendents just ignore phone calls and emails requesting it to avoid admitting they are breaking the law, said the state's AAE membership director, Charity Smith. This year, Smith said, a large male union representative met her at her presentation to a group of teachers and demanded she reveal whom she had talked to, where she was planning to visit next, and her home address. Teachers have whispered to her they were interested in leaving the union but couldn't talk about it openly at school, slipping her their email addresses for later communication.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Another example of ignorance in your blog post. The accusations being brought for by both Cole and Ms. Smith are blatantly false. During the testimony those speaking in opposition produced documents, emails, and thank you cards disputing the claims being made by Cole and Ms. Smith.
It is interesting that all the later had to offer was hearsay and anectodal evidence.

Speaks volumes doesn't it!