He believes that |gasp| there was a political aspect to why he was not selected to run for political office. From the DNews:
Morrill said in court documents that he believes his policy stance against charter schools and voucher programs made the committee vote to oust him — not his qualifications.
"Some members of the committee believed that his membership on the state school board had been and would continue to be inimical to their … partisan interests in relation to charter schools and other matters," the lawsuit states.
I guess all I can say is, if you are anti-charter, and the political reality is that charters are a popular and growing part of the public education system, why would it be a surprise to get weeded out? He obviously thinks that charter schools are a "partisan" issue, rather than an educational one.
His absence from the school board will be wonderful.