Once, a teacher working on her master's degree and writing a thesis on charter schools called me and asked me about the strengths and weaknesses of charters. Without a doubt, the greatest challenge that charter schools face as they get going is the lack of institutional knowledge about how schools operate efficiently.
Startup schools all face similar challenges, and as long as we have new groups opening new charters, these founders will have to learn the same lessons in the same way--trial and error.
That's a challenge for charters, but I wouldn't have it another way. The only way to find out if innovations will work to improve student learning is to try them. In trying new ideas and new approaches to education, sometimes the results aren't what we hope for, and so we recalibrate and try again.
Innovation and choice leads to both success and failure. The only other option is stagnation and mediocrity.
So, new charter schools, founded by a new set of parents in new communities, always face the same challenges. They are building a multi-million organization from scratch. They hire an entire staff and leadership who all figure out along the way how things will best work to achieve the school's mission and implement the charter.
When you have a 100 percent new staff, it's not uncommon that a high percentage of employees will be frustrated by the challenges of innovation, or will find that what they pictured the new charter school was, doesn't turn out the way they expected. The school leadership will also find that some of the staff aren't the right fit.
Parents find the same things. The school is sold to most parents based on what the school plans to be, and it seldom reaches that goal in year one. Parents tend to be frustrated by turnover, which is common in first year schools.
The parents and some faculty and staff are
experiencing this frustration at Excelsior Academy. This article is a fair representation of the perspective of parents, school leadership, and the school's authorizer.
Because it's fair, the most frustrated and vocal parents, who want to go through
another first year by replacing the school administration and board and starting from scratch, are mad. They let the world know they are mad in the
comments section of the article, where they take the reporter to task for presenting the school's perspective. I guess they think the school director, the board, and the authorizer shouldn't be interviewed or quoted in an article about the school.
Comments in articles about charter schools are always a hoot to read, so enjoy them.
As you do, know that the only way for charter schools, and therefore the entire concept of school choice, to succeed is by allowing autonomy and innovation. That will almost always lead to failure, which is the necessary precursor of success.
We shouldn't be upset when things don't go as planned. Instead, we should see that challenge as the opportunity to improve, now armed with more knowledge and experience to make success more likely tomorrow.